ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #22 of 36$0.161 per LiveBench case |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-08-24-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,226.96100% of row best · rating · ernie-5.1; 95% CI [1217.24505738, 1236.67203321]; votes 3788; rank 6 | 1,210.4699% of row best · rating · gemini-3.1-pro-grounding; 95% CI [1205.32063396, 1215.60669852]; votes 113282; rank 9 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,468.1099% of row best · rating · ernie-5.1; 95% CI [1463.48233336, 1472.72453179]; votes 37137; rank 25 | 1,480.10100% of row best · rating · gemini-3.1-pro-preview; 95% CI [1476.89767236, 1483.30025658]; votes 102763; rank 11 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winTied overall | 1 benchmark winTied overall |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Baidu | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Ernie 5 | Gemini 3 |
| Model | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| Version | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 131K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Baidu Qianfan (Standard) | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, reasoning, search, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
13 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
ERNIE 5.1 Capabilities
Gemini 3.1 Pro Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | ERNIE 5.1Baidu | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs |  DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | ERNIE 5.1Baidu | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro FAQs
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 3.1 Pro better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE 5.1 and Gemini 3.1 Pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
ERNIE 5.1 is $4.00 and Gemini 3.1 Pro is $2.00 per million tokens, so Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper on this metric. ERNIE 5.1 is $18.00 and Gemini 3.1 Pro is $12.00 per million tokens, so Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
Gemini 3.1 Pro has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE 5.1 supports 131K and Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 3.1 Pro be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. ERNIE 5.1 is not marked open weight; Gemini 3.1 Pro is not marked open weight.
Can ERNIE 5.1 and Gemini 3.1 Pro understand images?+
ERNIE 5.1 is not documented with image input; Gemini 3.1 Pro is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE 5.1 is 66K and Gemini 3.1 Pro is 66K.
Do ERNIE 5.1 and Gemini 3.1 Pro support reasoning and tool use?+
ERNIE 5.1: reasoning and tool calling. Gemini 3.1 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
ERNIE 5.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Gemini 3.1 Pro has 2, so Gemini 3.1 Pro has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.