ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemma 4 E2B
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 4 E2B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Baidu | Google Deepmind |
| Family | Ernie 5 | Gemma 4 |
| Model | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 4 E2B |
| Version | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 4 E2B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-03-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 131,072 | 131,072 |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Baidu Qianfan (Standard) | Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, reasoning, search, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
13 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
ERNIE 5.1 Capabilities
Gemma 4 E2B Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemma 4 E2BGoogle Deepmind | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle Deepmind | family variantsaudio, image, text, video |
Gemma 4 12BGoogle Deepmind | vs | Gemma 4 E2BGoogle Deepmind | family variantsaudio, image, text, video |
Gemma 4 E2BGoogle Deepmind | vs |  Muse Spark 1.1Meta | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs | Gemma 4 E2BGoogle Deepmind | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Gemma 4 E2BGoogle Deepmind | vs | Muse Spark 1.2Meta | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Gemma 4 E2BGoogle Deepmind | vs |  o3-proOpenai | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 1.8ByteDance Seed | vs | Gemma 4 E2BGoogle Deepmind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs | ERNIE X1.1Baidu | family variantstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs |  Sonar Deep ResearchPerplexity | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs | Sonar Reasoning ProPerplexity | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemma 4 E2BGoogle Deepmind | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
Gemma 4 E2BGoogle Deepmind | vs | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemma 4 E2B FAQs
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Gemma 4 E2B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE 5.1 and Gemma 4 E2B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemma 4 E2B?+
Only ERNIE 5.1 has a directly sourced input price: $4.00 per million tokens. Only ERNIE 5.1 has a directly sourced output price: $18.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemma 4 E2B?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. ERNIE 5.1 is 131,072 and Gemma 4 E2B is 131,072.
Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemma 4 E2B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can ERNIE 5.1 or Gemma 4 E2B be self-hosted?+
Gemma 4 E2B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. ERNIE 5.1 is not marked open weight; Gemma 4 E2B is open weight.
Can ERNIE 5.1 and Gemma 4 E2B understand images?+
ERNIE 5.1 is not documented with image input; Gemma 4 E2B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemma 4 E2B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE 5.1 is 65,536 and Gemma 4 E2B is —.
Do ERNIE 5.1 and Gemma 4 E2B support reasoning and tool use?+
ERNIE 5.1: reasoning and tool calling. Gemma 4 E2B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemma 4 E2B?+
ERNIE 5.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Gemma 4 E2B has 1, a tie.
Which offers better value, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemma 4 E2B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.