ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT vs ERNIE 5.1

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort#12 of 5773.5 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 24.5–91.2
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K131K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTERNIE 5.1
DeveloperBaiduBaidu
FamilyErnie 4 5 0 3b PtErnie 5
ModelERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTERNIE 5.1
VersionERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTERNIE 5.1
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K131K
Total parameters360.7MUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownBaidu Qianfan (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generationagents, chat, reasoning, search, tools

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT Capabilities

chatgeneration
Serving providers0
Canonical IDbaidu/ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT

ERNIE 5.1 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningsearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbaidu/ernie-5.1

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT vs ERNIE 5.1 FAQs

Is ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or ERNIE 5.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT and ERNIE 5.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or ERNIE 5.1?+

Only ERNIE 5.1 has a directly sourced input price: $4.00 per million tokens. Only ERNIE 5.1 has a directly sourced output price: $18.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or ERNIE 5.1?+

Both models have the same sourced context window: 131,072 tokens each.

Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or ERNIE 5.1?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or ERNIE 5.1 be self-hosted?+

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is documented as self-hostable; ERNIE 5.1 is documented as not self-hostable. ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is open weight; ERNIE 5.1 is not marked open weight.

Can ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT and ERNIE 5.1 understand images?+

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is not documented with image input; ERNIE 5.1 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or ERNIE 5.1?+

ERNIE 5.1 has a sourced maximum output of 65,536 tokens; ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT's maximum output is not reported. A larger limit cannot be determined.

Do ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT and ERNIE 5.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT: none of these features are definitively sourced. ERNIE 5.1: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or ERNIE 5.1?+

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT has 0 sourced provider routes; ERNIE 5.1 has 1, so ERNIE 5.1 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT or ERNIE 5.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback