ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemini Deep Research

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE 5.1 and Gemini Deep Research, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Only ERNIE 5.1 has a directly sourced input price: $4.00 per million tokens. Only ERNIE 5.1 has a directly sourced output price: $18.00 per million tokens.

Gemini Deep Research has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE 5.1 supports 131K and Gemini Deep Research supports 1,049K.

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. ERNIE 5.1 is not marked open weight; Gemini Deep Research is not marked open weight.

ERNIE 5.1 is not documented with image input; Gemini Deep Research is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE 5.1 is 66K and Gemini Deep Research is 66K.

ERNIE 5.1: reasoning and tool calling. Gemini Deep Research: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

ERNIE 5.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Gemini Deep Research has 2, so Gemini Deep Research has broader tracked availability.

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.