ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemini 3 Flash
At a Glance
| Compare |  ERNIE 5.1Baidu |  Gemini 3 FlashGoogle DeepMind |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.50Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $3.00Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 131K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 3 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-08-24-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,226.96100% of row best · rating · ernie-5.1; 95% CI [1217.24505738, 1236.67203321]; votes 3788; rank 6 | 1,198.0998% of row best · rating · gemini-3-flash-grounding; 95% CI [1193.35426288, 1202.82591975]; votes 149334; rank 15 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,468.20100% of row best · rating · ernie-5.1; 95% CI [1463.57689002, 1472.81364850]; votes 37058; rank 28 | 1,442.4098% of row best · rating · gemini-3-flash (thinking-minimal); 95% CI [1439.30492660, 1445.49388279]; votes 85799; rank 61 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 2 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 3 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Baidu | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Ernie 5 | Gemini 3 |
| Model | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 3 Flash |
| Version | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 3 Flash |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 131K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Baidu Qianfan (Standard) | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, reasoning, search, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
ERNIE 5.1 Capabilities
Gemini 3 Flash Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | ERNIE 5.1Baidu | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | ERNIE 5.1Baidu | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemini 3 Flash FAQs
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 3 Flash better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE 5.1 and Gemini 3 Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 3 Flash?+
ERNIE 5.1 is $4.00 and Gemini 3 Flash is $0.50 per million tokens, so Gemini 3 Flash is cheaper on this metric. ERNIE 5.1 is $18.00 and Gemini 3 Flash is $3.00 per million tokens, so Gemini 3 Flash is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 3 Flash?+
Gemini 3 Flash has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE 5.1 supports 131K and Gemini 3 Flash supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 3 Flash?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 3 Flash be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. ERNIE 5.1 is not marked open weight; Gemini 3 Flash is not marked open weight.
Can ERNIE 5.1 and Gemini 3 Flash understand images?+
ERNIE 5.1 is not documented with image input; Gemini 3 Flash is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 3 Flash?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE 5.1 is 66K and Gemini 3 Flash is 66K.
Do ERNIE 5.1 and Gemini 3 Flash support reasoning and tool use?+
ERNIE 5.1: reasoning and tool calling. Gemini 3 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 3 Flash?+
ERNIE 5.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Gemini 3 Flash has 2, so Gemini 3 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 3 Flash?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.