ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Baidu | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Ernie 4 5 0 3b Pt | Gemini 3 |
| Model | ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Version | ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 131,072 | 1,048,576 |
| Total parameters | 360,748,032 | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Google AI (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
11 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT Capabilities
Gemini 3.5 Flash Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 3 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-FlashQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini Deep Research MaxGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Pixtral LargeMistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs | ERNIE 5.1Baidu | family variantstext |
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PTBaidu | vs | ERNIE X1.1Baidu | family variantstext |
| vs | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT vs Gemini 3.5 Flash FAQs
Is ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT or Gemini 3.5 Flash better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT and Gemini 3.5 Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT or Gemini 3.5 Flash?+
Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a directly sourced input price: $1.50 per million tokens. Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a directly sourced output price: $9.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT or Gemini 3.5 Flash?+
Gemini 3.5 Flash has the larger sourced context window. ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT supports 131,072 and Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1,048,576.
Which performs better in benchmarks, ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT or Gemini 3.5 Flash?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT or Gemini 3.5 Flash be self-hosted?+
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT is open weight; Gemini 3.5 Flash is not marked open weight.
Can ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT and Gemini 3.5 Flash understand images?+
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT is not documented with image input; Gemini 3.5 Flash is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT or Gemini 3.5 Flash?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT is — and Gemini 3.5 Flash is 65,536.
Do ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT and Gemini 3.5 Flash support reasoning and tool use?+
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT: none of these features are definitively sourced. Gemini 3.5 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT or Gemini 3.5 Flash?+
ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT has 0 sourced provider routes; Gemini 3.5 Flash has 1, so Gemini 3.5 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT or Gemini 3.5 Flash?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.