DeepSeek V4 Pro Base vs MiMo V2.6 Pro

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.435Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.87Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 22, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4-Pro-BaseMiMo-V2.6-Pro
DeveloperDeepSeekXiaomi
FamilyDeepseek V4 Pro BaseMimo V2 6
ModelDeepSeek-V4-Pro-BaseMiMo-V2.6-Pro
VersionDeepSeek-V4-Pro-BaseMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-04-242026-09-21
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,049K
Total parameters1.6T1T
Active parametersUnknown42B
LicenseUnknownMIT
Open weightsYesYes
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessUnknownOpenrouter (Standard), Xiaomi MiMo (Standard)
Capabilitiesgenerationchat, generation, reasoning, tools

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base Capabilities

generation
Serving providers0
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Base

MiMo V2.6 Pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDxiaomi/mimo-v2.6-pro

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base vs MiMo V2.6 Pro FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or MiMo V2.6 Pro better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and MiMo V2.6 Pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

Only MiMo V2.6 Pro has a directly sourced input price: $0.435 per million tokens. Only MiMo V2.6 Pro has a directly sourced output price: $0.87 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base is 1,049K and MiMo V2.6 Pro is 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or MiMo V2.6 Pro be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base is open weight; MiMo V2.6 Pro is open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and MiMo V2.6 Pro understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base is not documented with image input; MiMo V2.6 Pro is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base is — and MiMo V2.6 Pro is 131K.

Do DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and MiMo V2.6 Pro support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base: none of these features are definitively sourced. MiMo V2.6 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base has 0 sourced provider routes; MiMo V2.6 Pro has 2, so MiMo V2.6 Pro has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro Base or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback