DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Max
At a Glance
| Compare | DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek | Qwen3.7 MaxQwen |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #13 of 44$0.057 per LiveBench case |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.0868Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026 | $1.475Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.1736Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026 | $4.425Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader | 1.80100% of row best · score · Deepseek V4 Flash (High) (20260731); 95% CI [1.06225523, 2.53222539]; sessions 64482; observations 6405377; rank 22 | -3.6395% of row best · score · Qwen3.7 Max; 95% CI [-4.47002493, -2.78058186]; sessions 38392; observations 1816729; rank 34 |
| LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader | 69.6790% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4-flash · 34,434 output tokens / case | 77.50100% of row best · percent · qwen3.7-max · 12,909 output tokens / case |
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 78.0096% of row best · points · DeepSeek V4 Flash (xhigh) · 12,709 output tokens / case | 81.26100% of row best · points · Qwen3.7 Max (default) · 8,636 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | Qwen |
| Family | Deepseek V4 Flash | Qwen3 7 |
| Model | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
| Version | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
| Lifecycle | retired | active |
| Released | 2026-04-24 | 2026-05-20 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 290.9B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 13B | Unknown |
| License | mit | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
DeepSeek V4 Flash Capabilities
Qwen3.7 Max Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Max FAQs
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.0868 and Qwen3.7 Max is $1.475 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.1736 and Qwen3.7 Max is $4.425 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Flash supports 1,049K and Qwen3.7 Max supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: The verified common benchmarks do not produce a majority winner.
Can DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max be self-hosted?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Flash is open weight; Qwen3.7 Max is not marked open weight.
Can DeepSeek V4 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max understand images?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash is not documented with image input; Qwen3.7 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Flash is — and Qwen3.7 Max is 66K.
Do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash: reasoning. Qwen3.7 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash has 5 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.7 Max has 4, so DeepSeek V4 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.