DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16
At a Glance
| Compare | DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #5 of 44$0.022 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.15DeepSeek ↗ · Sep 10, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.60Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 262K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 10, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | NVIDIA |
| Family | Deepseek V4 1 | Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3b Base Bf16 |
| Model | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 |
| Version | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-09-10 | 2025-12-15 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2025-06-25 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 262K |
| Total parameters | 763.2B | 31.6B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | mit | other |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Unknown |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, fim, generation, reasoning, responses, structured_outputs, tools, vision | generation |
| Architecture design | Causal Encoder-Decoder (20 encoder + 20 decoder layers) | Unknown |
| Backbone parameters | 552000000000 parameters | Unknown |
| Active parameters during decode | 16000000000 parameters | Unknown |
| Active parameters during prefill | 8000000000 parameters | Unknown |
| Pre-training corpus | 45000000000000 tokens | Unknown |
| Reasoning effort range | 1–100 | Unknown |
| Routed experts per MoE layer | 384 experts | Unknown |
| Routed experts per token | 6 experts | Unknown |
| Transformer layers | 40 layers | Unknown |
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Capabilities
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 FAQs
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16?+
Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a directly sourced input price: $0.15 per million tokens. Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a directly sourced output price: $0.60 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16?+
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supports 1,049K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 supports 262K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 is open weight.
Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 understand images?+
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16?+
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger sourced maximum output: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supports 393K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 supports 131K output tokens.
Do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16?+
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 3 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16 has 0, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Base BF16?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.