DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs OCR 4.1

At a Glance

Compare
OCR 4.1Mistral AI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#5 of 44$0.022 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.15DeepSeek · Sep 10, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.60Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049KNot reported
Model facts checkedSep 10, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashOCR 4.1
DeveloperDeepSeekMistral AI
FamilyDeepseek V4 1Mistral OCR
ModelDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashOCR 4.1
VersionDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashOCR 4.1
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-09-102026-07-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageImage, Document
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049KUnknown
Total parameters763.2BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Mistral AI (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, fim, generation, reasoning, responses, structured_outputs, tools, visionbounding-box-extraction, document-ai, ocr, structured-annotations
Architecture designCausal Encoder-Decoder (20 encoder + 20 decoder layers)Unknown
Backbone parameters552000000000 parametersUnknown
Active parameters during decode16000000000 parametersUnknown
Active parameters during prefill8000000000 parametersUnknown
Pre-training corpus45000000000000 tokensUnknown
Reasoning effort range1–100Unknown
Routed experts per MoE layer384 expertsUnknown
Routed experts per token6 expertsUnknown
Transformer layers40 layersUnknown

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Capabilities

agentschatfimgenerationreasoningresponsesstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

OCR 4.1 Capabilities

bounding-box-extractiondocument-aiocrstructured-annotations
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmistralai/mistral-ocr-4-1

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs OCR 4.1 FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or OCR 4.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and OCR 4.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or OCR 4.1?+

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a directly sourced input price: $0.15 per million tokens. Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a directly sourced output price: $0.60 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or OCR 4.1?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 1,049K and OCR 4.1 is —.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or OCR 4.1?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or OCR 4.1 be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is open weight; OCR 4.1 is not marked open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and OCR 4.1 understand images?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is documented with image input; OCR 4.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or OCR 4.1?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 393K and OCR 4.1 is —.

Do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and OCR 4.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. OCR 4.1: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or OCR 4.1?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 3 sourced provider routes; OCR 4.1 has 1, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or OCR 4.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback