DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#5 of 44$0.022 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.15DeepSeek · Sep 10, 2026$0.10Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.60Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026$0.32Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K131K
Model facts checkedSep 10, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
DeveloperDeepSeekMeta
FamilyDeepseek V4 1Llama 3 3 70b Instruct
ModelDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
VersionDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-09-102024-12-06
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K131K
Total parameters763.2B70.6B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licensemitllama3.3
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, fim, generation, reasoning, responses, structured_outputs, tools, visionchat, generation, tools
Architecture designCausal Encoder-Decoder (20 encoder + 20 decoder layers)Unknown
Backbone parameters552000000000 parametersUnknown
Active parameters during decode16000000000 parametersUnknown
Active parameters during prefill8000000000 parametersUnknown
Pre-training corpus45000000000000 tokensUnknown
Reasoning effort range1–100Unknown
Routed experts per MoE layer384 expertsUnknown
Routed experts per token6 expertsUnknown
Transformer layers40 layersUnknown

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Capabilities

agentschatfimgenerationreasoningresponsesstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is $0.15 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $0.10 per million tokens, so Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is $0.60 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $0.32 per million tokens, so Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supports 1,049K and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct supports 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is open weight; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct understand images?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is documented with image input; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 393K and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is —.

Do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 3 sourced provider routes; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has 3, a tie.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback