DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#38 of 4620.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#5 of 44$0.022 per LiveBench case#32 of 44$0.214 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#38 of 3826.5 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.15DeepSeek · Sep 10, 2026$0.75Openai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.60Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026$4.50Openai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K400K
Model facts checkedSep 10, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGPT-5.4 Mini
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader83.20100% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4.1-flash-max · 36,355 output tokens / case69.5384% of row best · percent · gpt-5.4-mini-xhigh · 47,448 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified88.03100% of row best · points · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) · 18,199 output tokens / case82.1693% of row best · points · GPT-5.4 mini (high) · 9,924 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGPT-5.4 Mini
DeveloperDeepSeekOpenAI
FamilyDeepseek V4 1Gpt 5 4
ModelDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGPT-5.4 Mini
VersionDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGPT-5.4 Mini
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-09-102026-03-17
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2025-08-31
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K400K
Total parameters763.2BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, fim, generation, reasoning, responses, structured_outputs, tools, visionchat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools
Architecture designCausal Encoder-Decoder (20 encoder + 20 decoder layers)Unknown
Backbone parameters552000000000 parametersUnknown
Active parameters during decode16000000000 parametersUnknown
Active parameters during prefill8000000000 parametersUnknown
Pre-training corpus45000000000000 tokensUnknown
Reasoning effort range1–100Unknown
Routed experts per MoE layer384 expertsUnknown
Routed experts per token6 expertsUnknown
Transformer layers40 layersUnknown

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Capabilities

agentschatfimgenerationreasoningresponsesstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

GPT-5.4 Mini Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5.4-mini

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.4 Mini better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-5.4 Mini, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.4 Mini?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is $0.15 and GPT-5.4 Mini is $0.75 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is $0.60 and GPT-5.4 Mini is $4.50 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.4 Mini?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supports 1,049K and GPT-5.4 Mini supports 400K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.4 Mini?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.4 Mini be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is open weight; GPT-5.4 Mini is not marked open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-5.4 Mini understand images?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is documented with image input; GPT-5.4 Mini is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.4 Mini?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger sourced maximum output: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supports 393K and GPT-5.4 Mini supports 128K output tokens.

Do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-5.4 Mini support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5.4 Mini: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.4 Mini?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 3 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.4 Mini has 2, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.4 Mini?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback