Command A Reasoning vs Muse Spark 1.1
At a Glance
| Compare |  Command A ReasoningCohere |  Muse Spark 1.1Meta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 256K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Command A Reasoning | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 62.9078% of row best · points · Cohere Command A Reasoning · 2,002 output tokens / case | 80.76100% of row best · points · Muse Spark 1.1 (thinking) · 6,037 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Command A Reasoning | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Cohere | Meta |
| Family | Command A | Muse Spark |
| Model | Command A Reasoning | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Version | Command A Reasoning | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2025-08-21 | 2026-07-09 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-06-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 256K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 111B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Cohere (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, citations, reasoning, rag, structured_outputs, tools | chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools |
Command A Reasoning Capabilities
Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Command A ReasoningCohere | cross-developer peerstext |
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Command A ReasoningCohere | cross-developer peerstext |
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Command A ReasoningCohere | cross-developer peerstext |
Command A ReasoningCohere | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Command A Reasoning vs Muse Spark 1.1 FAQs
Is Command A Reasoning or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Command A Reasoning and Muse Spark 1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Command A Reasoning or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.
Which has a larger context window, Command A Reasoning or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Muse Spark 1.1 has the larger sourced context window. Command A Reasoning supports 256K and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Command A Reasoning or Muse Spark 1.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Command A Reasoning or Muse Spark 1.1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Command A Reasoning is not marked open weight; Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Command A Reasoning and Muse Spark 1.1 understand images?+
Command A Reasoning is not documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Command A Reasoning or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Command A Reasoning is 32K and Muse Spark 1.1 is —.
Do Command A Reasoning and Muse Spark 1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Command A Reasoning: reasoning and tool calling. Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Command A Reasoning or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Command A Reasoning has 1 sourced provider route; Muse Spark 1.1 has 0, so Command A Reasoning has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Command A Reasoning or Muse Spark 1.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.