Command A vs MiMo V2.6 Pro
At a Glance
| Compare |  Command ACohere |  MiMo V2.6 ProXiaomi |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $2.50Cohere ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $0.435Openrouter ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $10.00Cohere ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $0.87Openrouter ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 256K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 22, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Command A | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Cohere | Xiaomi |
| Family | Command A | Mimo V2 6 |
| Model | Command A | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Version | Command A | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-09-21 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-06-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 256K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | 111B | 1T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 42B |
| License | Unknown | MIT |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Cohere (Standard) | Openrouter (Standard), Xiaomi MiMo (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, citations, multilingual, rag, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
Command A Capabilities
MiMo V2.6 Pro Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Command ACohere | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Command ACohere | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Command ACohere | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Command ACohere | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Command A vs MiMo V2.6 Pro FAQs
Is Command A or MiMo V2.6 Pro better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Command A and MiMo V2.6 Pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Command A or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
Command A is $2.50 and MiMo V2.6 Pro is $0.435 per million tokens, so MiMo V2.6 Pro is cheaper on this metric. Command A is $10.00 and MiMo V2.6 Pro is $0.87 per million tokens, so MiMo V2.6 Pro is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Command A or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
MiMo V2.6 Pro has the larger sourced context window. Command A supports 256K and MiMo V2.6 Pro supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Command A or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Command A or MiMo V2.6 Pro be self-hosted?+
MiMo V2.6 Pro is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Command A is not marked open weight; MiMo V2.6 Pro is open weight.
Can Command A and MiMo V2.6 Pro understand images?+
Command A is not documented with image input; MiMo V2.6 Pro is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Command A or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
MiMo V2.6 Pro has the larger sourced maximum output: Command A supports 8K and MiMo V2.6 Pro supports 131K output tokens.
Do Command A and MiMo V2.6 Pro support reasoning and tool use?+
Command A: tool calling. MiMo V2.6 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Command A or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
Command A has 1 sourced provider route; MiMo V2.6 Pro has 2, so MiMo V2.6 Pro has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Command A or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.