Command A vs Mistral Large 3
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,330.7993% of row best · rating · command-a-03-2025; 95% CI [1327.33626503, 1334.25009199]; votes 55434; rank 208 | 1,427.62100% of row best · rating · mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1424.57601414, 1430.66670291]; votes 65336; rank 85 |
| ToneBench2026-08-28-10-task-cd9819ab6e4d · overall_score · leader | 60.9087% of row best · points · Cohere Command A (03-2025) · 1,177 output tokens / case | 70.39100% of row best · points · Mistral Large 3 · 2,056 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 2 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Command A | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Family | Command A | Mistral Large 3 |
| Model | Command A | Mistral Large 3 |
| Version | Command A | Mistral Large 3 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2025-12-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-06-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Document |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 256K | 262K |
| Total parameters | 111B | 675B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 41B |
| License | Unknown | Apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Cohere (Standard) | Mistral AI (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, citations, multilingual, rag, structured_outputs, tools | agents, chat, generation, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
14 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Command A Capabilities
Mistral Large 3 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Command ACohere | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Command ACohere | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Command ACohere | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Command ACohere | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Command A vs Mistral Large 3 FAQs
Is Command A or Mistral Large 3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Command A and Mistral Large 3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Command A or Mistral Large 3?+
Command A is $2.50 and Mistral Large 3 is $0.50 per million tokens, so Mistral Large 3 is cheaper on this metric. Command A is $10.00 and Mistral Large 3 is $1.50 per million tokens, so Mistral Large 3 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Command A or Mistral Large 3?+
Mistral Large 3 has the larger sourced context window. Command A supports 256K and Mistral Large 3 supports 262K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Command A or Mistral Large 3?+
Mistral Large 3 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 2 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Command A or Mistral Large 3 be self-hosted?+
Mistral Large 3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Command A is not marked open weight; Mistral Large 3 is open weight.
Can Command A and Mistral Large 3 understand images?+
Command A is not documented with image input; Mistral Large 3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Command A or Mistral Large 3?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Command A is 8K and Mistral Large 3 is —.
Do Command A and Mistral Large 3 support reasoning and tool use?+
Command A: tool calling. Mistral Large 3: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Command A or Mistral Large 3?+
Command A has 1 sourced provider route; Mistral Large 3 has 2, so Mistral Large 3 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Command A or Mistral Large 3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.