Command A vs gpt-oss-120b
At a Glance
| Compare |  Command ACohere |  gpt-oss-120bOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $2.50Cohere ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $0.037Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $10.00Cohere ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $0.17Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 256K | 131K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Command A | gpt-oss-120b |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglotpolyglot-225-5dc9490bb35f · pass_rate_2 · leader | 12.0029% of row best · percent · whole; aider 0.77.1.dev | 41.78100% of row best · percent · diff; aider 0.85.3.dev · 3,806.6 output tokens / case |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,330.8797% of row best · rating · command-a-03-2025; 95% CI [1327.41159924, 1334.32729730]; votes 55449; rank 211 | 1,365.87100% of row best · rating · gpt-oss-120b; 95% CI [1361.49487468, 1370.23719284]; votes 29955; rank 176 |
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 60.9090% of row best · points · Cohere Command A (03-2025) · 1,177 output tokens / case | 68.01100% of row best · points · gpt-oss 120B (high) · 7,577 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 2 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Command A | gpt-oss-120b |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Cohere | OpenAI |
| Family | Command A | Gpt Oss 120b |
| Model | Command A | gpt-oss-120b |
| Version | Command A | gpt-oss-120b |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-06-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 256K | 131K |
| Total parameters | 111B | 116.8B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 5.1B |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Cohere (Standard) | Cerebras (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Serverless, Standard), Groq (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Serverless, Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, citations, multilingual, rag, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
Command A Capabilities
gpt-oss-120b Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Command ACohere | vs | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Command ACohere | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Command ACohere | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Command ACohere | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Command A vs gpt-oss-120b FAQs
Is Command A or gpt-oss-120b better for coding?+
gpt-oss-120b leads the current coding subset with 1 benchmark win to 0. This describes only the matched benchmark rows shown above.
Which is cheaper, Command A or gpt-oss-120b?+
Command A is $2.50 and gpt-oss-120b is $0.037 per million tokens, so gpt-oss-120b is cheaper on this metric. Command A is $10.00 and gpt-oss-120b is $0.17 per million tokens, so gpt-oss-120b is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Command A or gpt-oss-120b?+
Command A has the larger sourced context window. Command A supports 256K and gpt-oss-120b supports 131K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Command A or gpt-oss-120b?+
gpt-oss-120b leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 2 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Command A or gpt-oss-120b be self-hosted?+
gpt-oss-120b is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Command A is not marked open weight; gpt-oss-120b is open weight.
Can Command A and gpt-oss-120b understand images?+
Command A is not documented with image input; gpt-oss-120b is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Command A or gpt-oss-120b?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Command A is 8K and gpt-oss-120b is —.
Do Command A and gpt-oss-120b support reasoning and tool use?+
Command A: tool calling. gpt-oss-120b: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Command A or gpt-oss-120b?+
Command A has 1 sourced provider route; gpt-oss-120b has 7, so gpt-oss-120b has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Command A or gpt-oss-120b?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.