Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingClaude Opus 5GPT-6 Astra
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2#2 of 2294.1 scoreUnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#33 of 36$0.371 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0#7 of 2256.8 scoreUnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5GPT-6 Astra
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-2aa739d957fc · verified_score · leader97.5099% of row best · percent · Claude Opus 5 (Max)98.50100% of row best · percent · GPT-6 Astra (XHigh)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-b5cb5ec6e8c7 · verified_score · leader90.4295% of row best · percent · Claude Opus 5 (Max)95.00100% of row best · percent · GPT-6 Astra (Max)
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins2 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Anthropic · activeClaude Opus 5Verified Aug 28, 2026
OpenAI · activeGPT-6 AstraVerified Sep 4, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldClaude Opus 5GPT-6 Astra
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI
FamilyClaude 5Gpt 6
ModelClaude Opus 5GPT-6 Astra
VersionClaude Opus 5GPT-6 Astra
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-07-242026-09-03
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2026-04-30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K1,050K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, tools

14 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Claude Opus 5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$5.00
Output price$25.00
Serving providers3
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-opus-5

GPT-6 Astra Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchtools
Input price$10.00
Output price$50.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-6-astra

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra FAQs

Is Claude Opus 5 or GPT-6 Astra better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 5 and GPT-6 Astra, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

Claude Opus 5 is $5.00 and GPT-6 Astra is $10.00 per million tokens, so Claude Opus 5 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Opus 5 is $25.00 and GPT-6 Astra is $50.00 per million tokens, so Claude Opus 5 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

GPT-6 Astra has the larger sourced context window. Claude Opus 5 supports 1,000K and GPT-6 Astra supports 1,050K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Claude Opus 5 or GPT-6 Astra be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Opus 5 is not marked open weight; GPT-6 Astra is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Opus 5 and GPT-6 Astra understand images?+

Claude Opus 5 is documented with image input; GPT-6 Astra is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Opus 5 is 128K and GPT-6 Astra is 128K.

Do Claude Opus 5 and GPT-6 Astra support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Opus 5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-6 Astra: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

Claude Opus 5 has 3 sourced provider routes; GPT-6 Astra has 2, so Claude Opus 5 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Opus 5 or GPT-6 Astra?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback