Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic |  Muse Glimmer 30BMeta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $10.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 2, 2026 | $0.30Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $50.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 2, 2026 | $1.20Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 131K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Mythos 5.1 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Meta |
| Family | Claude 5 1 | Muse Glimmer |
| Model | Claude Mythos 5.1 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
| Version | Claude Mythos 5.1 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-09-01 | 2026-08-09 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2026-06-01 | 2026-01-04 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 131K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 29.8B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Project Glasswing) | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Claude Mythos 5.1 Capabilities
Muse Glimmer 30B Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B FAQs
Is Claude Mythos 5.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Mythos 5.1 and Muse Glimmer 30B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
Claude Mythos 5.1 is $10.00 and Muse Glimmer 30B is $0.30 per million tokens, so Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper on this metric. Claude Mythos 5.1 is $50.00 and Muse Glimmer 30B is $1.20 per million tokens, so Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
Claude Mythos 5.1 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Mythos 5.1 supports 1,000K and Muse Glimmer 30B supports 131K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Claude Mythos 5.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B be self-hosted?+
Muse Glimmer 30B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Mythos 5.1 is not marked open weight; Muse Glimmer 30B is open weight.
Can Claude Mythos 5.1 and Muse Glimmer 30B understand images?+
Claude Mythos 5.1 is documented with image input; Muse Glimmer 30B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Mythos 5.1 is 128K and Muse Glimmer 30B is —.
Do Claude Mythos 5.1 and Muse Glimmer 30B support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Mythos 5.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Muse Glimmer 30B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
Claude Mythos 5.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Muse Glimmer 30B has 3, so Muse Glimmer 30B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.