Claude Mythos 5.1 vs MiMo V2.6 Pro
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic |  MiMo V2.6 ProXiaomi |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $10.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 2, 2026 | $0.435Openrouter ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $50.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 2, 2026 | $0.87Openrouter ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 22, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Mythos 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Family | Claude 5 1 | Mimo V2 6 |
| Model | Claude Mythos 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Version | Claude Mythos 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-21 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2026-06-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 1T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 42B |
| License | Unknown | MIT |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Project Glasswing) | Openrouter (Standard), Xiaomi MiMo (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
Claude Mythos 5.1 Capabilities
MiMo V2.6 Pro Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Mythos 5.1 vs MiMo V2.6 Pro FAQs
Is Claude Mythos 5.1 or MiMo V2.6 Pro better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Mythos 5.1 and MiMo V2.6 Pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Mythos 5.1 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
Claude Mythos 5.1 is $10.00 and MiMo V2.6 Pro is $0.435 per million tokens, so MiMo V2.6 Pro is cheaper on this metric. Claude Mythos 5.1 is $50.00 and MiMo V2.6 Pro is $0.87 per million tokens, so MiMo V2.6 Pro is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Mythos 5.1 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
MiMo V2.6 Pro has the larger sourced context window. Claude Mythos 5.1 supports 1,000K and MiMo V2.6 Pro supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Mythos 5.1 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Claude Mythos 5.1 or MiMo V2.6 Pro be self-hosted?+
MiMo V2.6 Pro is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Mythos 5.1 is not marked open weight; MiMo V2.6 Pro is open weight.
Can Claude Mythos 5.1 and MiMo V2.6 Pro understand images?+
Claude Mythos 5.1 is documented with image input; MiMo V2.6 Pro is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Mythos 5.1 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
MiMo V2.6 Pro has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Mythos 5.1 supports 128K and MiMo V2.6 Pro supports 131K output tokens.
Do Claude Mythos 5.1 and MiMo V2.6 Pro support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Mythos 5.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. MiMo V2.6 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Mythos 5.1 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
Claude Mythos 5.1 has 1 sourced provider route; MiMo V2.6 Pro has 2, so MiMo V2.6 Pro has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Mythos 5.1 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.