Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Grok 4.3

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Anthropic · activeClaude Mythos 5.1Verified Sep 2, 2026
xAI · activeGrok 4.3Verified Sep 3, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldClaude Mythos 5.1Grok 4.3
DeveloperAnthropicxAI
FamilyClaude 5 1Grok 4
ModelClaude Mythos 5.1Grok 4.3
VersionClaude Mythos 5.1Grok 4.3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-09-012026-06-17
Knowledge cutoff2026-06-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Project Glasswing)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

14 comparable fields · 7 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Claude Mythos 5.1 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$10.00
Output price$50.00
Serving providers1
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-mythos-5-1

Grok 4.3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$1.25
Output price$2.50
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.3

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Grok 4.3 FAQs

Is Claude Mythos 5.1 or Grok 4.3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Mythos 5.1 and Grok 4.3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Grok 4.3?+

Claude Mythos 5.1 is $10.00 and Grok 4.3 is $1.25 per million tokens, so Grok 4.3 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Mythos 5.1 is $50.00 and Grok 4.3 is $2.50 per million tokens, so Grok 4.3 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Grok 4.3?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Claude Mythos 5.1 is 1,000,000 and Grok 4.3 is 1,000,000.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Grok 4.3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Mythos 5.1 or Grok 4.3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Mythos 5.1 is not marked open weight; Grok 4.3 is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Mythos 5.1 and Grok 4.3 understand images?+

Claude Mythos 5.1 is documented with image input; Grok 4.3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Grok 4.3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Mythos 5.1 is 128,000 and Grok 4.3 is —.

Do Claude Mythos 5.1 and Grok 4.3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Mythos 5.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Grok 4.3?+

Claude Mythos 5.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Grok 4.3 has 1, a tie.

Which offers better value, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Grok 4.3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback