Claude Mythos 5.1 vs DeepSeek V3

At a Glance

Compare
DeepSeek V3DeepSeek
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$10.00Anthropic · Sep 2, 2026$0.2574Openrouter · Aug 29, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$50.00Anthropic · Sep 2, 2026$0.89Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K164K
Model facts checkedSep 2, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Mythos 5.1DeepSeek-V3
DeveloperAnthropicDeepSeek
FamilyClaude 5 1Deepseek V3
ModelClaude Mythos 5.1DeepSeek-V3
VersionClaude Mythos 5.1DeepSeek-V3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-09-012024-12-26
Knowledge cutoff2026-06-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K164K
Total parametersUnknown684.5B
Active parametersUnknown37B
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessAnthropic (Project Glasswing)Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation

Claude Mythos 5.1 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-mythos-5-1

DeepSeek V3 Capabilities

chatgeneration
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Mythos 5.1 vs DeepSeek V3 FAQs

Is Claude Mythos 5.1 or DeepSeek V3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Mythos 5.1 and DeepSeek V3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Mythos 5.1 or DeepSeek V3?+

Claude Mythos 5.1 is $10.00 and DeepSeek V3 is $0.2574 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V3 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Mythos 5.1 is $50.00 and DeepSeek V3 is $0.89 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V3 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Mythos 5.1 or DeepSeek V3?+

Claude Mythos 5.1 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Mythos 5.1 supports 1,000K and DeepSeek V3 supports 164K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Mythos 5.1 or DeepSeek V3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Mythos 5.1 or DeepSeek V3 be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Mythos 5.1 is not marked open weight; DeepSeek V3 is open weight.

Can Claude Mythos 5.1 and DeepSeek V3 understand images?+

Claude Mythos 5.1 is documented with image input; DeepSeek V3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Mythos 5.1 or DeepSeek V3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Mythos 5.1 is 128K and DeepSeek V3 is —.

Do Claude Mythos 5.1 and DeepSeek V3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Mythos 5.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. DeepSeek V3: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Mythos 5.1 or DeepSeek V3?+

Claude Mythos 5.1 has 1 sourced provider route; DeepSeek V3 has 3, so DeepSeek V3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Mythos 5.1 or DeepSeek V3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback