Claude Fable 5.1 vs Granite 4.1 8B

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Anthropic · activeClaude Fable 5.1Verified Sep 2, 2026
IBM · activeGranite 4.1 8BVerified Aug 28, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldClaude Fable 5.1granite-4.1-8b
DeveloperAnthropicIBM
FamilyClaude 5 1Granite 4 1 8b
ModelClaude Fable 5.1granite-4.1-8b
VersionClaude Fable 5.1granite-4.1-8b
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-09-012026-04-29
Knowledge cutoff2026-06-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K131K
Total parametersUnknown8.8B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard)Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, tools

14 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Claude Fable 5.1 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$10.00
Output price$50.00
Serving providers1
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-fable-5-1

Granite 4.1 8B Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Input price$0.050
Output price$0.10
Serving providers1
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-4.1-8b

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Granite 4.1 8B FAQs

Is Claude Fable 5.1 or Granite 4.1 8B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Fable 5.1 and Granite 4.1 8B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Granite 4.1 8B?+

Claude Fable 5.1 is $10.00 and Granite 4.1 8B is $0.050 per million tokens, so Granite 4.1 8B is cheaper on this metric. Claude Fable 5.1 is $50.00 and Granite 4.1 8B is $0.10 per million tokens, so Granite 4.1 8B is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or Granite 4.1 8B?+

Claude Fable 5.1 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Fable 5.1 supports 1,000K and Granite 4.1 8B supports 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Fable 5.1 or Granite 4.1 8B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Fable 5.1 or Granite 4.1 8B be self-hosted?+

Granite 4.1 8B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Fable 5.1 is not marked open weight; Granite 4.1 8B is open weight.

Can Claude Fable 5.1 and Granite 4.1 8B understand images?+

Claude Fable 5.1 is documented with image input; Granite 4.1 8B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Fable 5.1 or Granite 4.1 8B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Fable 5.1 is 128K and Granite 4.1 8B is —.

Do Claude Fable 5.1 and Granite 4.1 8B support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Fable 5.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Granite 4.1 8B: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Fable 5.1 or Granite 4.1 8B?+

Claude Fable 5.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Granite 4.1 8B has 1, a tie.

Which offers better value, Claude Fable 5.1 or Granite 4.1 8B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback