SmolVLA 450M vs Lyria 3.5
At a Glance
| Compare |  SmolVLA 450MHugging Face LeRobot |  Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | Not reported | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 22, 2026View model evidence → |
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | SmolVLA 450M | Lyria 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Hugging Face LeRobot | Google DeepMind |
| Family | SmolVLA | Lyria |
| Model | SmolVLA 450M | Lyria 3.5 |
| Version | 450M | Lyria 3.5 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-06-03 | 2026-07-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Robot state | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Robot action | Text, Audio |
| Context window | Unknown | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | 450M | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) |
| Capabilities | asynchronous-inference, fine-tuning, low-cost-hardware, manipulation | generation, image-to-music, lyrics, music-generation, synthid, vocals |
| Robotics model type | Vision-language-action model | Unknown |
| Action representation | Continuous action chunks from a flow-matching action expert | Unknown |
| Control architecture | SmolVLM2 backbone with flow-matching action expert | Unknown |
| Inference location | On device | Unknown |
| Native control rate (Hz) | Unknown | Unknown |
| Supported embodiments | SO-100, SO-101, LeKiwi, LIBERO Franka | Unknown |
| Training data | Compatibly licensed LeRobot community datasets totaling fewer than 30,000 episodes in the cited release. | Unknown |
SmolVLA 450M Capabilities
Lyria 3.5 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
SmolVLA 450MHugging Face LeRobot | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peers |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | SmolVLA 450MHugging Face LeRobot | cross-developer peers |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | SmolVLA 450MHugging Face LeRobot | cross-developer peers |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | SmolVLA 450MHugging Face LeRobot | cross-developer peers |
SmolVLA 450MHugging Face LeRobot | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peers |
SmolVLA 450MHugging Face LeRobot | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peers |
SmolVLA 450MHugging Face LeRobot | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peers |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | SmolVLA 450MHugging Face LeRobot | cross-developer peers |
SmolVLA 450MHugging Face LeRobot | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peers |
SmolVLA 450MHugging Face LeRobot | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peers |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | SmolVLA 450MHugging Face LeRobot | cross-developer peers |
SmolVLA 450MHugging Face LeRobot | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peers |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
SmolVLA 450M vs Lyria 3.5 FAQs
Is SmolVLA 450M or Lyria 3.5 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both SmolVLA 450M and Lyria 3.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, SmolVLA 450M or Lyria 3.5?+
Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.
Which has a larger context window, SmolVLA 450M or Lyria 3.5?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. SmolVLA 450M is — and Lyria 3.5 is 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, SmolVLA 450M or Lyria 3.5?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can SmolVLA 450M or Lyria 3.5 be self-hosted?+
SmolVLA 450M is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. SmolVLA 450M is open weight; Lyria 3.5 is not marked open weight.
Can SmolVLA 450M and Lyria 3.5 understand images?+
SmolVLA 450M is documented with image input; Lyria 3.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, SmolVLA 450M or Lyria 3.5?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. SmolVLA 450M is — and Lyria 3.5 is 66K.
Do SmolVLA 450M and Lyria 3.5 support reasoning and tool use?+
SmolVLA 450M: image input. Lyria 3.5: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, SmolVLA 450M or Lyria 3.5?+
SmolVLA 450M has 0 sourced provider routes; Lyria 3.5 has 2, so Lyria 3.5 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, SmolVLA 450M or Lyria 3.5?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.