Seed 2.1 Pro vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
At a Glance
| Compare | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.10Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.32Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | Not reported | 131K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Seed 2.1 Pro | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | ByteDance Seed | Meta |
| Family | Seed 2 1 | Llama 3 3 70b Instruct |
| Model | Seed 2.1 Pro | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
| Version | Seed 2.1 Pro | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-06-23 | 2024-12-06 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | Unknown | 131K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 70.6B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | llama3.3 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, tools |
Seed 2.1 Pro Capabilities
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Seed 2.1 Pro vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct FAQs
Is Seed 2.1 Pro or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 2.1 Pro and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.1 Pro or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+
Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a directly sourced input price: $0.10 per million tokens. Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a directly sourced output price: $0.32 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Seed 2.1 Pro or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 2.1 Pro is — and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 131K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 2.1 Pro or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Seed 2.1 Pro or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct be self-hosted?+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Seed 2.1 Pro is not marked open weight; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is open weight.
Can Seed 2.1 Pro and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct understand images?+
Seed 2.1 Pro is documented with image input; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Seed 2.1 Pro or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 2.1 Pro is — and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is —.
Do Seed 2.1 Pro and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+
Seed 2.1 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 2.1 Pro or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+
Seed 2.1 Pro has 0 sourced provider routes; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has 3, so Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Seed 2.1 Pro or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.