Seed 2.1 Pro vs Grok Build 0.1
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Seed 2.1 Pro | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #1 of 36$0.0020 per LiveBench case |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Seed 2.1 Pro | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | ByteDance Seed | xAI |
| Family | Seed 2 1 | Grok Build |
| Model | Seed 2.1 Pro | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Version | Seed 2.1 Pro | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2026-06-23 | 2026-05-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | Unknown | 256K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
12 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Seed 2.1 Pro Capabilities
Grok Build 0.1 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs |  DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Seed 2.1 Pro vs Grok Build 0.1 FAQs
Is Seed 2.1 Pro or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 2.1 Pro and Grok Build 0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.1 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+
Only Grok Build 0.1 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only Grok Build 0.1 has a directly sourced output price: $2.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Seed 2.1 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 2.1 Pro is — and Grok Build 0.1 is 256K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 2.1 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Seed 2.1 Pro or Grok Build 0.1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Seed 2.1 Pro is not marked open weight; Grok Build 0.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Seed 2.1 Pro and Grok Build 0.1 understand images?+
Seed 2.1 Pro is documented with image input; Grok Build 0.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Seed 2.1 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 2.1 Pro is — and Grok Build 0.1 is —.
Do Seed 2.1 Pro and Grok Build 0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Seed 2.1 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok Build 0.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 2.1 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+
Seed 2.1 Pro has 0 sourced provider routes; Grok Build 0.1 has 1, so Grok Build 0.1 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Seed 2.1 Pro or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.