Seed 2.0 Lite vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
At a Glance
| Compare | Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed |  DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort | #20 of 4665.0 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #20 of 44$0.094 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort | #14 of 3857.4 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.25Openrouter ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 | $1.30Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $2.00Openrouter ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 | $2.60Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | Not reported | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Seed 2.0 Lite | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | ByteDance Seed | DeepSeek |
| Family | Seed 2 0 | Deepseek V4 Pro |
| Model | Seed 2.0 Lite | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
| Version | Seed 2.0 Lite | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2026-08-13 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | Unknown | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 1.6T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 49B |
| License | Unknown | mit |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Openrouter (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | agents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools |
Seed 2.0 Lite Capabilities
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs | DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | family variantsimage, text, video |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Seed 2.0 Lite vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 FAQs
Is Seed 2.0 Lite or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 2.0 Lite and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Lite or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
Seed 2.0 Lite is $0.25 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $1.30 per million tokens, so Seed 2.0 Lite is cheaper on this metric. Seed 2.0 Lite is $2.00 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $2.60 per million tokens, so Seed 2.0 Lite is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Seed 2.0 Lite or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 2.0 Lite is — and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 2.0 Lite or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Seed 2.0 Lite or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 be self-hosted?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Seed 2.0 Lite is not marked open weight; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight.
Can Seed 2.0 Lite and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 understand images?+
Seed 2.0 Lite is documented with image input; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Seed 2.0 Lite or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 2.0 Lite is — and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is —.
Do Seed 2.0 Lite and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 support reasoning and tool use?+
Seed 2.0 Lite: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 2.0 Lite or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
Seed 2.0 Lite has 1 sourced provider route; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Seed 2.0 Lite or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.