Seed 2.0 Lite vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Seed 2.0 Lite | DeepSeek-V4-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #9 of 36$0.054 per LiveBench case |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Seed 2.0 Lite | DeepSeek-V4-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | ByteDance Seed | DeepSeek |
| Family | Seed 2 0 | Deepseek V4 Pro |
| Model | Seed 2.0 Lite | DeepSeek-V4-Pro |
| Version | Seed 2.0 Lite | DeepSeek-V4-Pro |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2026-04-24 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | Unknown | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 1.6T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 49B |
| License | Unknown | mit |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Openrouter (Standard) | DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning |
13 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Seed 2.0 Lite Capabilities
DeepSeek V4 Pro Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | family variantsimage, text, video |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Seed 2.0 Lite vs DeepSeek V4 Pro FAQs
Is Seed 2.0 Lite or DeepSeek V4 Pro better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 2.0 Lite and DeepSeek V4 Pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Lite or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+
Seed 2.0 Lite is $0.25 and DeepSeek V4 Pro is $0.66 per million tokens, so Seed 2.0 Lite is cheaper on this metric. Seed 2.0 Lite is $2.00 and DeepSeek V4 Pro is $1.5441 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Seed 2.0 Lite or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 2.0 Lite is — and DeepSeek V4 Pro is 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 2.0 Lite or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Seed 2.0 Lite or DeepSeek V4 Pro be self-hosted?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Seed 2.0 Lite is not marked open weight; DeepSeek V4 Pro is open weight.
Can Seed 2.0 Lite and DeepSeek V4 Pro understand images?+
Seed 2.0 Lite is documented with image input; DeepSeek V4 Pro is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Seed 2.0 Lite or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 2.0 Lite is — and DeepSeek V4 Pro is —.
Do Seed 2.0 Lite and DeepSeek V4 Pro support reasoning and tool use?+
Seed 2.0 Lite: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. DeepSeek V4 Pro: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 2.0 Lite or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+
Seed 2.0 Lite has 1 sourced provider route; DeepSeek V4 Pro has 6, so DeepSeek V4 Pro has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Seed 2.0 Lite or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.