Seed 2.0 Code vs o3-pro
At a Glance
| Compare | Seed 2.0 CodeByteDance Seed | o3-proOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.50Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $20.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $3.00Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $80.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | Not reported | 200K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Seed 2.0 Code | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | ByteDance Seed | OpenAI |
| Family | Seed 2 0 | O3 |
| Model | Seed 2.0 Code | o3-pro |
| Version | Seed 2.0 Code | o3-pro |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2025-06-10 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2024-06-01 |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | Unknown | 200K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Openrouter (Standard) | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Seed 2.0 Code Capabilities
o3-pro Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Seed 2.0 Code vs o3-pro FAQs
Is Seed 2.0 Code or o3-pro better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 2.0 Code and o3-pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Code or o3-pro?+
Seed 2.0 Code is $0.50 and o3-pro is $20.00 per million tokens, so Seed 2.0 Code is cheaper on this metric. Seed 2.0 Code is $3.00 and o3-pro is $80.00 per million tokens, so Seed 2.0 Code is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Seed 2.0 Code or o3-pro?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 2.0 Code is — and o3-pro is 200K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 2.0 Code or o3-pro?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Seed 2.0 Code or o3-pro be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Seed 2.0 Code is not marked open weight; o3-pro is not marked open weight.
Can Seed 2.0 Code and o3-pro understand images?+
Seed 2.0 Code is not documented with image input; o3-pro is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Seed 2.0 Code or o3-pro?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 2.0 Code is — and o3-pro is 100K.
Do Seed 2.0 Code and o3-pro support reasoning and tool use?+
Seed 2.0 Code: reasoning and tool calling. o3-pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 2.0 Code or o3-pro?+
Seed 2.0 Code has 1 sourced provider route; o3-pro has 2, so o3-pro has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Seed 2.0 Code or o3-pro?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.