Seed 1.8 vs Mistral Small 4 119B 2603

At a Glance

Compare
Seed 1.8ByteDance Seed
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.15Openrouter · Aug 29, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.60Openrouter · Aug 29, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokensNot reported1,049K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldSeed 1.8Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603
DeveloperByteDance SeedMistral AI
FamilySeed 1 8Mistral Small 4 119b 2603
ModelSeed 1.8Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603
VersionSeed 1.8Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context windowUnknown1,049K
Total parametersUnknown119.4B
Active parametersUnknown6.5B
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessUnknownOpenrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

Seed 1.8 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDbytedance-seed/seed-1.8

Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmistralai/Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Seed 1.8 vs Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 FAQs

Is Seed 1.8 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 1.8 and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Seed 1.8 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+

Only Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 has a directly sourced input price: $0.15 per million tokens. Only Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 has a directly sourced output price: $0.60 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Seed 1.8 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 1.8 is — and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 1.8 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Seed 1.8 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 be self-hosted?+

Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Seed 1.8 is not marked open weight; Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is open weight.

Can Seed 1.8 and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 understand images?+

Seed 1.8 is documented with image input; Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Seed 1.8 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 1.8 is — and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 is —.

Do Seed 1.8 and Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 support reasoning and tool use?+

Seed 1.8: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Mistral Small 4 119B 2603: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 1.8 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+

Seed 1.8 has 0 sourced provider routes; Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 has 1, so Mistral Small 4 119B 2603 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Seed 1.8 or Mistral Small 4 119B 2603?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback