Qwen3 VL Plus vs Grok Build 0.1
At a Glance
| Compare |  Qwen3 VL PlusQwen | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #1 of 44$0.0020 per LiveBench case |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $1.00Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $2.00Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | 256K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3 VL Plus | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | xAI |
| Family | Qwen3 VL | Grok Build |
| Model | Qwen3 VL Plus | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Version | Qwen3 VL Plus | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2025-12-19 | 2026-05-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 256K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard) | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Qwen3 VL Plus Capabilities
Grok Build 0.1 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | vs | Qwen3 VL PlusQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Qwen3 VL PlusQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Qwen3 VL PlusQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Qwen3 VL PlusQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3 VL PlusQwen | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3 VL PlusQwen | vs | Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | family variantsimage, text, video |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | Qwen3 VL PlusQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Qwen3 VL PlusQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3 VL PlusQwen | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3 VL PlusQwen | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Qwen3 VL PlusQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | Qwen3 VL PlusQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3 VL Plus vs Grok Build 0.1 FAQs
Is Qwen3 VL Plus or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3 VL Plus and Grok Build 0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL Plus or Grok Build 0.1?+
Qwen3 VL Plus is $1.00 and Grok Build 0.1 is $1.00 per million tokens, so they are tied on this metric. Qwen3 VL Plus is $10.00 and Grok Build 0.1 is $2.00 per million tokens, so Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 VL Plus or Grok Build 0.1?+
Qwen3 VL Plus has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3 VL Plus supports 262K and Grok Build 0.1 supports 256K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3 VL Plus or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Qwen3 VL Plus or Grok Build 0.1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Qwen3 VL Plus is not marked open weight; Grok Build 0.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Qwen3 VL Plus and Grok Build 0.1 understand images?+
Qwen3 VL Plus is documented with image input; Grok Build 0.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3 VL Plus or Grok Build 0.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3 VL Plus is — and Grok Build 0.1 is —.
Do Qwen3 VL Plus and Grok Build 0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3 VL Plus: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok Build 0.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3 VL Plus or Grok Build 0.1?+
Qwen3 VL Plus has 1 sourced provider route; Grok Build 0.1 has 1, a tie.
Which offers better value, Qwen3 VL Plus or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.