Qwen3 VL Flash vs Grok Build 0.1
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Qwen3 VL Flash | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #1 of 36$0.0020 per LiveBench case |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3 VL Flash | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | xAI |
| Family | Qwen3 VL | Grok Build |
| Model | Qwen3 VL Flash | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Version | Qwen3 VL Flash | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2026-01-22 | 2026-05-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 256K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard) | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
14 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Qwen3 VL Flash Capabilities
Grok Build 0.1 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | vs | Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | family variantsimage, text, video |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3 VL Flash vs Grok Build 0.1 FAQs
Is Qwen3 VL Flash or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3 VL Flash and Grok Build 0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL Flash or Grok Build 0.1?+
Qwen3 VL Flash is $0.15 and Grok Build 0.1 is $1.00 per million tokens, so Qwen3 VL Flash is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3 VL Flash is $1.50 and Grok Build 0.1 is $2.00 per million tokens, so Qwen3 VL Flash is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 VL Flash or Grok Build 0.1?+
Qwen3 VL Flash has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3 VL Flash supports 262K and Grok Build 0.1 supports 256K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3 VL Flash or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Qwen3 VL Flash or Grok Build 0.1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Qwen3 VL Flash is not marked open weight; Grok Build 0.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Qwen3 VL Flash and Grok Build 0.1 understand images?+
Qwen3 VL Flash is documented with image input; Grok Build 0.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3 VL Flash or Grok Build 0.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3 VL Flash is — and Grok Build 0.1 is —.
Do Qwen3 VL Flash and Grok Build 0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3 VL Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok Build 0.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3 VL Flash or Grok Build 0.1?+
Qwen3 VL Flash has 1 sourced provider route; Grok Build 0.1 has 1, a tie.
Which offers better value, Qwen3 VL Flash or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.