Qwen3 VL Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash
At a Glance
| Compare |  Qwen3 VL FlashQwen |  GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort | #29 of 4654.6 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 36.4–69.8 |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #2 of 44$0.0087 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort | #1 of 3877.3 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 68.2–84.9 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.075Z.ai ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.25Z.ai ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3 VL Flash | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | Z.ai |
| Family | Qwen3 VL | Glm 5 3 Flash |
| Model | Qwen3 VL Flash | GLM-5.3-Flash |
| Version | Qwen3 VL Flash | GLM-5.3-Flash |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-01-22 | 2026-09-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video, Document |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 320B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 18B |
| License | Unknown | MIT |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard), Z.ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision | agents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
Qwen3 VL Flash Capabilities
GLM 5.3 Flash Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | vs | Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | family variantsimage, text, video |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | vs | GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3 VL Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash FAQs
Is Qwen3 VL Flash or GLM 5.3 Flash better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3 VL Flash and GLM 5.3 Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL Flash or GLM 5.3 Flash?+
Qwen3 VL Flash is $0.15 and GLM 5.3 Flash is $0.075 per million tokens, so GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3 VL Flash is $1.50 and GLM 5.3 Flash is $0.25 per million tokens, so GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 VL Flash or GLM 5.3 Flash?+
GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3 VL Flash supports 262K and GLM 5.3 Flash supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3 VL Flash or GLM 5.3 Flash?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Qwen3 VL Flash or GLM 5.3 Flash be self-hosted?+
GLM 5.3 Flash is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Qwen3 VL Flash is not marked open weight; GLM 5.3 Flash is open weight.
Can Qwen3 VL Flash and GLM 5.3 Flash understand images?+
Qwen3 VL Flash is documented with image input; GLM 5.3 Flash is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3 VL Flash or GLM 5.3 Flash?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3 VL Flash is — and GLM 5.3 Flash is 131K.
Do Qwen3 VL Flash and GLM 5.3 Flash support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3 VL Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GLM 5.3 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3 VL Flash or GLM 5.3 Flash?+
Qwen3 VL Flash has 1 sourced provider route; GLM 5.3 Flash has 4, so GLM 5.3 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Qwen3 VL Flash or GLM 5.3 Flash?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.