Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Grok Build 0.1
At a Glance
| Compare |  Qwen3 Coder PlusQwen | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #1 of 44$0.0020 per LiveBench case |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.65Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $1.00Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $3.25Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $2.00Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 256K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3 Coder Plus | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | xAI |
| Family | Qwen3 Coder | Grok Build |
| Model | Qwen3 Coder Plus | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Version | Qwen3 Coder Plus | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2025-09-23 | 2026-05-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 256K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Qwen3 Coder Plus Capabilities
Grok Build 0.1 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | vs | Qwen3 Coder PlusQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Qwen3 Coder PlusQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Qwen3 Coder PlusQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Qwen3 Coder PlusQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3 Coder PlusQwen | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3 Coder PlusQwen | vs | Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | family variantstext |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | Qwen3 Coder PlusQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Qwen3 Coder PlusQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3 Coder PlusQwen | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3 Coder PlusQwen | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Qwen3 Coder PlusQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | Qwen3 Coder PlusQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Grok Build 0.1 FAQs
Is Qwen3 Coder Plus or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3 Coder Plus and Grok Build 0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Plus or Grok Build 0.1?+
Qwen3 Coder Plus is $0.65 and Grok Build 0.1 is $1.00 per million tokens, so Qwen3 Coder Plus is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3 Coder Plus is $3.25 and Grok Build 0.1 is $2.00 per million tokens, so Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 Coder Plus or Grok Build 0.1?+
Qwen3 Coder Plus has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3 Coder Plus supports 1,000K and Grok Build 0.1 supports 256K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3 Coder Plus or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Qwen3 Coder Plus or Grok Build 0.1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Qwen3 Coder Plus is not marked open weight; Grok Build 0.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Qwen3 Coder Plus and Grok Build 0.1 understand images?+
Qwen3 Coder Plus is not documented with image input; Grok Build 0.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3 Coder Plus or Grok Build 0.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3 Coder Plus is — and Grok Build 0.1 is —.
Do Qwen3 Coder Plus and Grok Build 0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3 Coder Plus: reasoning and tool calling. Grok Build 0.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3 Coder Plus or Grok Build 0.1?+
Qwen3 Coder Plus has 2 sourced provider routes; Grok Build 0.1 has 1, so Qwen3 Coder Plus has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Qwen3 Coder Plus or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.