Qwen3 Coder Next vs Llama 3.1 70B

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.12Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.80Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K131K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldQwen3-Coder-NextLlama-3.1-70B
DeveloperQwenMeta
FamilyQwen3 Coder NextLlama 3 1 70b
ModelQwen3-Coder-NextLlama-3.1-70B
VersionQwen3-Coder-NextLlama-3.1-70B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-02-022024-07-23
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K131K
Total parameters79.7B70.6B
Active parameters3BUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0llama3.1
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessHugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Hugging Face (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolsgeneration

Qwen3 Coder Next Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDQwen/Qwen3-Coder-Next

Llama 3.1 70B Capabilities

generation
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Llama 3.1 70B FAQs

Is Qwen3 Coder Next or Llama 3.1 70B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3 Coder Next and Llama 3.1 70B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Next or Llama 3.1 70B?+

Only Qwen3 Coder Next has a directly sourced input price: $0.12 per million tokens. Only Qwen3 Coder Next has a directly sourced output price: $0.80 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 Coder Next or Llama 3.1 70B?+

Qwen3 Coder Next has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3 Coder Next supports 262,144 tokens and Llama 3.1 70B supports 131,072 tokens.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3 Coder Next or Llama 3.1 70B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Qwen3 Coder Next or Llama 3.1 70B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3 Coder Next is open weight; Llama 3.1 70B is open weight.

Can Qwen3 Coder Next and Llama 3.1 70B understand images?+

Qwen3 Coder Next is not documented with image input; Llama 3.1 70B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3 Coder Next or Llama 3.1 70B?+

Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.

Do Qwen3 Coder Next and Llama 3.1 70B support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3 Coder Next: tool calling. Llama 3.1 70B: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3 Coder Next or Llama 3.1 70B?+

Qwen3 Coder Next has 2 sourced provider routes; Llama 3.1 70B has 1, so Qwen3 Coder Next has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Qwen3 Coder Next or Llama 3.1 70B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback