Qwen3 Coder Next vs Devstral 2 123B Instruct 2512

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3 Coder Next and Devstral 2 123B Instruct 2512, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Qwen3 Coder Next is $0.12 and Devstral 2 123B Instruct 2512 is $0.44 per million tokens, so Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3 Coder Next is $0.80 and Devstral 2 123B Instruct 2512 is $2.20 per million tokens, so Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper on this metric.

Both models have the same sourced context window: 262,144 tokens each.

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3 Coder Next is open weight; Devstral 2 123B Instruct 2512 is open weight.

Qwen3 Coder Next is not documented with image input; Devstral 2 123B Instruct 2512 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.

Qwen3 Coder Next: tool calling. Devstral 2 123B Instruct 2512: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Qwen3 Coder Next has 2 sourced provider routes; Devstral 2 123B Instruct 2512 has 1, so Qwen3 Coder Next has broader tracked availability.

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.