Qwen3.8 Flash vs Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium
At a Glance
| Compare |  Qwen3.8 FlashQwen |  Stable Diffusion 3.5 MediumStability AI |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #4 of 44$0.021 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.113Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.382Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 0K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3.8-Flash | stable-diffusion-3.5-medium |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | Stability AI |
| Family | Qwen3 8 Flash | Stable Diffusion 3 5 Medium |
| Model | Qwen3.8-Flash | stable-diffusion-3.5-medium |
| Version | Qwen3.8-Flash | stable-diffusion-3.5-medium |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2024-10-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Image |
| Context window | 1,000K | 0K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 2.5B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | other |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Hugging Face (Standard), Stability AI (Pay as you go) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision | generation |
Qwen3.8 Flash Capabilities
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | vs | Qwen3.8-FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Qwen3.8-FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Qwen3.8-FlashQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Qwen3.8-FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.8-FlashQwen | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.8-FlashQwen | vs | Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | family variantsimage, text, video |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | Qwen3.8-FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Qwen3.8-FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.8-FlashQwen | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3.8-FlashQwen | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Qwen3.8-FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | Qwen3.8-FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3.8 Flash vs Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium FAQs
Is Qwen3.8 Flash or Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.8 Flash and Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Flash or Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium?+
Only Qwen3.8 Flash has a directly sourced input price: $0.113 per million tokens. Only Qwen3.8 Flash has a directly sourced output price: $0.382 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.8 Flash or Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium?+
Qwen3.8 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.8 Flash supports 1,000K and Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium supports 0K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.8 Flash or Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Qwen3.8 Flash or Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium be self-hosted?+
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Qwen3.8 Flash is not marked open weight; Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium is open weight.
Can Qwen3.8 Flash and Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium understand images?+
Qwen3.8 Flash is documented with image input; Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.8 Flash or Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.8 Flash is 131K and Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium is —.
Do Qwen3.8 Flash and Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3.8 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.8 Flash or Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium?+
Qwen3.8 Flash has 4 sourced provider routes; Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium has 2, so Qwen3.8 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Qwen3.8 Flash or Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.