Model comparison · text

Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B vs Kimi-K2.6

Symmetrical, primary-source facts with unknown values left visible. No winner is assigned without comparable measurements.

FieldAt a glance
Qwen · activeQwen3.8-2.4T-A95BVerified Aug 28, 2026
Moonshot AI · activeKimi-K2.6Verified Aug 28, 2026

Technical differences

Side-by-side facts

Indexable
FieldQwen3.8-2.4T-A95BKimi-K2.6
DeveloperQwenMoonshot AI
FamilyQwen3 8 2 4t A95bKimi K2 6
ModelQwen3.8-2.4T-A95BKimi-K2.6
VersionQwen3.8-2.4T-A95BKimi-K2.6
Lifecycleactiveactive
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262144262144
Total parameters24461827255041026879376368
Active parameters9500000000032000000000
Licenseotherother
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

15 comparable fields · 7 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Primary benchmark evidence

Comparable performance

All benchmark results →
No protocol-matched benchmark yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$2.00
Output price$6.00
Serving providers1
Canonical IDQwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B

Kimi-K2.6 capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$0.95
Output price$4.00
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K2.6

Internal comparison graph

Related comparisons

All text comparisons →

Primary evidence

Sources and freshness