Qwen3.7 Flash vs Hy4 preview

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Qwen · activeQwen3.7 FlashVerified Sep 3, 2026
Tencent · previewHy4 previewVerified Sep 2, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldQwen3.7 FlashHy4 preview
DeveloperQwenTencent
FamilyQwen3 7Hy4
ModelQwen3.7 FlashHy4 preview
VersionQwen3.7 FlashHy4 preview
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2026-07-152026-08-28
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K1,000K
Total parametersUnknown770B
Active parametersUnknown49B
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessAlibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, visionchat, generation, reasoning, tools

14 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Qwen3.7 Flash Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Input price$0.030
Output price$0.13
Serving providers2
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.7-flash

Hy4 preview Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$0.834
Output price$2.501
Serving providers1
Canonical IDtencent/Hy4-preview

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3.7 Flash vs Hy4 preview FAQs

Is Qwen3.7 Flash or Hy4 preview better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.7 Flash and Hy4 preview, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Flash or Hy4 preview?+

Qwen3.7 Flash is $0.030 and Hy4 preview is $0.834 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.7 Flash is $0.13 and Hy4 preview is $2.501 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.7 Flash or Hy4 preview?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Qwen3.7 Flash is 1,000K and Hy4 preview is 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Flash or Hy4 preview?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Qwen3.7 Flash or Hy4 preview be self-hosted?+

Hy4 preview is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Qwen3.7 Flash is not marked open weight; Hy4 preview is open weight.

Can Qwen3.7 Flash and Hy4 preview understand images?+

Qwen3.7 Flash is documented with image input; Hy4 preview is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.7 Flash or Hy4 preview?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.7 Flash is 66K and Hy4 preview is —.

Do Qwen3.7 Flash and Hy4 preview support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3.7 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Hy4 preview: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.7 Flash or Hy4 preview?+

Qwen3.7 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; Hy4 preview has 1, so Qwen3.7 Flash has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Qwen3.7 Flash or Hy4 preview?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback