Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Solar Pro 4

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.14Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026$0.090Upstage · Sep 18, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026$0.36Upstage · Sep 18, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K524K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 18, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldQwen3.5-35B-A3BSolar Pro 4
DeveloperQwenUpstage
FamilyQwen3 5 35b A3bSolar Pro
ModelQwen3.5-35B-A3BSolar Pro 4
VersionQwen3.5-35B-A3BSolar Pro 4
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2026-08-14
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K524K
Total parameters36BUnknown
Active parameters3BUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Upstage (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools
Supported languagesUnknownEnglish, Korean, Japanese
Training data cutoffUnknownFebruary 2026

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers4
Canonical IDQwen/Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Solar Pro 4 Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDupstage/solar-pro-4

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Solar Pro 4 FAQs

Is Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Solar Pro 4 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.5 35B A3B and Solar Pro 4, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Solar Pro 4?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B is $0.14 and Solar Pro 4 is $0.090 per million tokens, so Solar Pro 4 is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.5 35B A3B is $1.00 and Solar Pro 4 is $0.36 per million tokens, so Solar Pro 4 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Solar Pro 4?+

Solar Pro 4 has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.5 35B A3B supports 262K and Solar Pro 4 supports 524K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Solar Pro 4?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Solar Pro 4 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3.5 35B A3B is open weight; Solar Pro 4 is not marked open weight.

Can Qwen3.5 35B A3B and Solar Pro 4 understand images?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B is documented with image input; Solar Pro 4 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Solar Pro 4?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.5 35B A3B is — and Solar Pro 4 is 131K.

Do Qwen3.5 35B A3B and Solar Pro 4 support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Solar Pro 4: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Solar Pro 4?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B has 4 sourced provider routes; Solar Pro 4 has 1, so Qwen3.5 35B A3B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Solar Pro 4?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback