Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
At a Glance
| Compare |  Qwen3.5 35B A3BQwen | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.14Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.00Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,395.50100% of row best · rating · qwen3.5-35b-a3b; 95% CI [1391.20067764, 1399.79162231]; votes 29043; rank 148 | 1,330.7295% of row best · rating · nvidia-nemotron-3.5-lightning-30b-a3b-nvfp4; 95% CI [1323.44362436, 1337.99938875]; votes 8338; rank 213 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | NVIDIA |
| Family | Qwen3 5 35b A3b | Nvidia Nemotron 3 5 Lightning |
| Model | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B |
| Version | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-08-11 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | 36B | 30B |
| Active parameters | 3B | 3B |
| License | apache-2.0 | openmdw-1.1 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Fireworks Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
Qwen3.5 35B A3B Capabilities
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen | vs | Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | family variantsimage, text |
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B FAQs
Is Qwen3.5 35B A3B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.5 35B A3B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
Only Qwen3.5 35B A3B has a directly sourced input price: $0.14 per million tokens. Only Qwen3.5 35B A3B has a directly sourced output price: $1.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.5 35B A3B supports 262K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Qwen3.5 35B A3B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3.5 35B A3B is open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is open weight.
Can Qwen3.5 35B A3B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B understand images?+
Qwen3.5 35B A3B is documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.5 35B A3B is — and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is —.
Do Qwen3.5 35B A3B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
Qwen3.5 35B A3B has 4 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has 1, so Qwen3.5 35B A3B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.