Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Granite 4.1 30B

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.14Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K131K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldQwen3.5-35B-A3Bgranite-4.1-30b
DeveloperQwenIBM
FamilyQwen3 5 35b A3bGranite 4 1 30b
ModelQwen3.5-35B-A3Bgranite-4.1-30b
VersionQwen3.5-35B-A3Bgranite-4.1-30b
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2026-04-29
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K131K
Total parameters36B28.9B
Active parameters3BUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0apache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, tools

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers4
Canonical IDQwen/Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Granite 4.1 30B Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-4.1-30b

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Granite 4.1 30B FAQs

Is Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Granite 4.1 30B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.5 35B A3B and Granite 4.1 30B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Granite 4.1 30B?+

Only Qwen3.5 35B A3B has a directly sourced input price: $0.14 per million tokens. Only Qwen3.5 35B A3B has a directly sourced output price: $1.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Granite 4.1 30B?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.5 35B A3B supports 262K and Granite 4.1 30B supports 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Granite 4.1 30B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Granite 4.1 30B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3.5 35B A3B is open weight; Granite 4.1 30B is open weight.

Can Qwen3.5 35B A3B and Granite 4.1 30B understand images?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B is documented with image input; Granite 4.1 30B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Granite 4.1 30B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.5 35B A3B is — and Granite 4.1 30B is —.

Do Qwen3.5 35B A3B and Granite 4.1 30B support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Granite 4.1 30B: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Granite 4.1 30B?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B has 4 sourced provider routes; Granite 4.1 30B has 0, so Qwen3.5 35B A3B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Granite 4.1 30B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback