Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#28 of 4655.3 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 36.9–70.2
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#10 of 44$0.054 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#12 of 3858.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 49.2–65.9
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.14Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026$0.66DeepSeek · Sep 2, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026$1.5441Openrouter · Aug 28, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkQwen3.5-35B-A3BDeepSeek-V4-Pro
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,395.5096% of row best · rating · qwen3.5-35b-a3b; 95% CI [1391.20067764, 1399.79162231]; votes 29043; rank 1481,450.63100% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-pro; 95% CI [1446.64622706, 1454.61308427]; votes 54130; rank 43
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner1 benchmark winNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldQwen3.5-35B-A3BDeepSeek-V4-Pro
DeveloperQwenDeepSeek
FamilyQwen3 5 35b A3bDeepseek V4 Pro
ModelQwen3.5-35B-A3BDeepSeek-V4-Pro
VersionQwen3.5-35B-A3BDeepSeek-V4-Pro
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2026-04-24
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,049K
Total parameters36B1.6T
Active parameters3B49B
Licenseapache-2.0mit
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers4
Canonical IDQwen/Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

DeepSeek V4 Pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers6
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro FAQs

Is Qwen3.5 35B A3B or DeepSeek V4 Pro better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.5 35B A3B and DeepSeek V4 Pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B is $0.14 and DeepSeek V4 Pro is $0.66 per million tokens, so Qwen3.5 35B A3B is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.5 35B A3B is $1.00 and DeepSeek V4 Pro is $1.5441 per million tokens, so Qwen3.5 35B A3B is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.5 35B A3B supports 262K and DeepSeek V4 Pro supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Qwen3.5 35B A3B or DeepSeek V4 Pro be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3.5 35B A3B is open weight; DeepSeek V4 Pro is open weight.

Can Qwen3.5 35B A3B and DeepSeek V4 Pro understand images?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B is documented with image input; DeepSeek V4 Pro is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.5 35B A3B is — and DeepSeek V4 Pro is —.

Do Qwen3.5 35B A3B and DeepSeek V4 Pro support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. DeepSeek V4 Pro: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B has 4 sourced provider routes; DeepSeek V4 Pro has 6, so DeepSeek V4 Pro has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback