Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base vs ERNIE X1.1

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K66K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldQwen3.5-35B-A3B-BaseERNIE X1.1
DeveloperQwenBaidu
FamilyQwen3 5 35b A3b BaseErnie X1
ModelQwen3.5-35B-A3B-BaseERNIE X1.1
VersionQwen3.5-35B-A3B-BaseERNIE X1.1
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2025-09-26
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K66K
Total parameters36BUnknown
Active parameters3BUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownBaidu Qianfan (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolsagents, chat, reasoning, search, tools

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDQwen/Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-Base

ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningsearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbaidu/ernie-x1.1

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base vs ERNIE X1.1 FAQs

Is Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base or ERNIE X1.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base and ERNIE X1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base or ERNIE X1.1?+

Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced output price: $4.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base or ERNIE X1.1?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base supports 262K and ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base or ERNIE X1.1?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base or ERNIE X1.1 be self-hosted?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base is open weight; ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight.

Can Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base and ERNIE X1.1 understand images?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base is documented with image input; ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base or ERNIE X1.1?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base is — and ERNIE X1.1 is 66K.

Do Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base and ERNIE X1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base: tool calling and image input. ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base or ERNIE X1.1?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base has 0 sourced provider routes; ERNIE X1.1 has 1, so ERNIE X1.1 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base or ERNIE X1.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback