Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base vs ERNIE 5.1

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K131K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldQwen3.5-35B-A3B-BaseERNIE 5.1
DeveloperQwenBaidu
FamilyQwen3 5 35b A3b BaseErnie 5
ModelQwen3.5-35B-A3B-BaseERNIE 5.1
VersionQwen3.5-35B-A3B-BaseERNIE 5.1
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K131K
Total parameters36BUnknown
Active parameters3BUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownBaidu Qianfan (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolsagents, chat, reasoning, search, tools

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDQwen/Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-Base

ERNIE 5.1 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningsearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbaidu/ernie-5.1

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base vs ERNIE 5.1 FAQs

Is Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base or ERNIE 5.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base and ERNIE 5.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base or ERNIE 5.1?+

Only ERNIE 5.1 has a directly sourced input price: $4.00 per million tokens. Only ERNIE 5.1 has a directly sourced output price: $18.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base or ERNIE 5.1?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base supports 262K and ERNIE 5.1 supports 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base or ERNIE 5.1?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base or ERNIE 5.1 be self-hosted?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base is open weight; ERNIE 5.1 is not marked open weight.

Can Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base and ERNIE 5.1 understand images?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base is documented with image input; ERNIE 5.1 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base or ERNIE 5.1?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base is — and ERNIE 5.1 is 66K.

Do Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base and ERNIE 5.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base: tool calling and image input. ERNIE 5.1: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base or ERNIE 5.1?+

Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base has 0 sourced provider routes; ERNIE 5.1 has 1, so ERNIE 5.1 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Qwen3.5 35B A3B Base or ERNIE 5.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback