Provider comparison · 2 shared models
DeepInfra vs Groq
Green highlights mark broader sourced coverage or lower directly comparable prices. They do not imply independently measured performance.
Routing surface
Side-by-side provider facts
| Field | DeepInfra | Groq |
|---|---|---|
| Routing mode | direct | direct |
| API protocol | openai | openai |
| API base URL | https://api.deepinfra.com/v1/openai | https://api.groq.com/openai/v1 |
| Route-ready models | 2 | 2 |
| Tracked model offerings | 2 | 2 |
| Lowest input / 1M | $0.030 | $0.075 |
| Lowest output / 1M | $0.14 | $0.30 |
| Service tiers | Standard | Standard |
| Regions | Unknown | Unknown |
8 comparable fields · 3 material differences · Interactive only until provider-comparison indexing and telemetry gates are defined
DeepInfra route contract
API base
https://api.deepinfra.com/v1/openaiInput from$0.030
Output from$0.14
Shared routes2
Groq route contract
API base
https://api.groq.com/openai/v1Input from$0.075
Output from$0.30
Shared routes2
Common coverage
Models offered by both providers
Provider evidence
Sources and freshness
DeepInfra gpt-oss-20b API documentationDeepInfra · observed Aug 28, 2026 · Provider-reportedDeepInfra gpt-oss-120b API documentationDeepInfra · observed Aug 28, 2026 · Provider-reportedGroq GPT OSS 20B model documentationGroq · observed Aug 28, 2026 · Provider-reportedGroq GPT OSS 120B model documentationGroq · observed Aug 28, 2026 · Provider-reported