phi-4 vs Qwen3 VL Plus

At a Glance

Compare
phi-4Microsoft
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.070Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.14Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens16K262K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

Fieldphi-4Qwen3 VL Plus
DeveloperMicrosoftQwen
FamilyPhi 4Qwen3 VL
Modelphi-4Qwen3 VL Plus
Versionphi-4Qwen3 VL Plus
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2024-12-122025-12-19
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window16K262K
Total parameters14.7BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generationchat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

phi-4 Capabilities

chatgeneration
Serving providers3
Canonical IDmicrosoft/phi-4

Qwen3 VL Plus Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers1
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3-vl-plus

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

phi-4 vs Qwen3 VL Plus FAQs

Is phi-4 or Qwen3 VL Plus better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both phi-4 and Qwen3 VL Plus, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, phi-4 or Qwen3 VL Plus?+

phi-4 is $0.070 and Qwen3 VL Plus is $1.00 per million tokens, so phi-4 is cheaper on this metric. phi-4 is $0.14 and Qwen3 VL Plus is $10.00 per million tokens, so phi-4 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, phi-4 or Qwen3 VL Plus?+

Qwen3 VL Plus has the larger sourced context window. phi-4 supports 16K and Qwen3 VL Plus supports 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, phi-4 or Qwen3 VL Plus?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can phi-4 or Qwen3 VL Plus be self-hosted?+

phi-4 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. phi-4 is open weight; Qwen3 VL Plus is not marked open weight.

Can phi-4 and Qwen3 VL Plus understand images?+

phi-4 is not documented with image input; Qwen3 VL Plus is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, phi-4 or Qwen3 VL Plus?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. phi-4 is — and Qwen3 VL Plus is —.

Do phi-4 and Qwen3 VL Plus support reasoning and tool use?+

phi-4: none of these features are definitively sourced. Qwen3 VL Plus: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, phi-4 or Qwen3 VL Plus?+

phi-4 has 3 sourced provider routes; Qwen3 VL Plus has 1, so phi-4 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, phi-4 or Qwen3 VL Plus?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback