Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Phi-4 Reasoning

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K33K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldPhi-4-mini-instructPhi-4-reasoning
DeveloperMicrosoftMicrosoft
FamilyPhi 4 Mini InstructPhi 4 Reasoning
ModelPhi-4-mini-instructPhi-4-reasoning
VersionPhi-4-mini-instructPhi-4-reasoning
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-02-262025-04-30
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K33K
Total parameters3.8B14.7B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licensemitmit
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessHugging Face (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generationchat, generation, reasoning

Phi-4 Mini Instruct Capabilities

chatgeneration
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmicrosoft/Phi-4-mini-instruct

Phi-4 Reasoning Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmicrosoft/Phi-4-reasoning

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Phi-4 Reasoning FAQs

Is Phi-4 Mini Instruct or Phi-4 Reasoning better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Phi-4 Mini Instruct and Phi-4 Reasoning, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Phi-4 Mini Instruct or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, Phi-4 Mini Instruct or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

Phi-4 Mini Instruct has the larger sourced context window. Phi-4 Mini Instruct supports 131,072 tokens and Phi-4 Reasoning supports 32,768 tokens.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Phi-4 Mini Instruct or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Phi-4 Mini Instruct or Phi-4 Reasoning be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. Phi-4 Mini Instruct is open weight; Phi-4 Reasoning is open weight.

Can Phi-4 Mini Instruct and Phi-4 Reasoning understand images?+

Phi-4 Mini Instruct is not documented with image input; Phi-4 Reasoning is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Phi-4 Mini Instruct or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.

Do Phi-4 Mini Instruct and Phi-4 Reasoning support reasoning and tool use?+

Phi-4 Mini Instruct: none of these features are definitively sourced. Phi-4 Reasoning: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Phi-4 Mini Instruct or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

Phi-4 Mini Instruct has 1 sourced provider route; Phi-4 Reasoning has 0, so Phi-4 Mini Instruct has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Phi-4 Mini Instruct or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback