Model comparison · text

granite-4.1-3b vs Phi-4-mini-instruct

Symmetrical, primary-source facts with unknown values left visible. No winner is assigned without comparable measurements.

FieldAt a glance
IBM · activegranite-4.1-3bVerified Aug 28, 2026
Microsoft · activePhi-4-mini-instructVerified Aug 28, 2026

Technical differences

Side-by-side facts

Indexable
Fieldgranite-4.1-3bPhi-4-mini-instruct
DeveloperIBMMicrosoft
FamilyGranite 4 1 3bPhi 4 Mini Instruct
Modelgranite-4.1-3bPhi-4-mini-instruct
Versiongranite-4.1-3bPhi-4-mini-instruct
Lifecycleactiveactive
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131072131072
Total parameters34028364803836021760
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0mit
Open weightsYesYes
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolschat, generation

13 comparable fields · 7 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Primary benchmark evidence

Comparable performance

All benchmark results →
No protocol-matched benchmark yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

granite-4.1-3b capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-4.1-3b

Phi-4-mini-instruct capabilities

chatgeneration
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmicrosoft/Phi-4-mini-instruct

Internal comparison graph

Related comparisons

All text comparisons →

Primary evidence

Sources and freshness