Model comparison · image, text

PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 vs granite-vision-4.1-4b

Symmetrical, primary-source facts with unknown values left visible. No winner is assigned without comparable measurements.

FieldAt a glance
Baidu · activePaddleOCR-VL-1.5Verified Aug 28, 2026
IBM · activegranite-vision-4.1-4bVerified Aug 28, 2026

Technical differences

Side-by-side facts

Indexable
FieldPaddleOCR-VL-1.5granite-vision-4.1-4b
DeveloperBaiduIBM
FamilyPaddleocr VL 1 5Granite Vision 4 1 4b
ModelPaddleOCR-VL-1.5granite-vision-4.1-4b
VersionPaddleOCR-VL-1.5granite-vision-4.1-4b
Lifecycleactiveactive
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131072131072
Total parameters9585887363997203904
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0apache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableUnknownUnknown
Self-hostableYesYes
Capabilitieschat, generationchat, generation, tools

13 comparable fields · 6 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Primary benchmark evidence

Comparable performance

All benchmark results →
No protocol-matched benchmark yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 capabilities

chatgeneration
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDPaddlePaddle/PaddleOCR-VL-1.5

granite-vision-4.1-4b capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-vision-4.1-4b

Internal comparison graph

Related comparisons

All image comparisons →

Primary evidence

Sources and freshness