PaddleOCR VL 1.5 vs ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K131K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldPaddleOCR-VL-1.5ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT
DeveloperBaiduBaidu
FamilyPaddleocr VL 1 5Ernie 4 5 0 3b Pt
ModelPaddleOCR-VL-1.5ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT
VersionPaddleOCR-VL-1.5ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-01-29Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K131K
Total parameters958.6M360.7M
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0apache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableUnknownUnknown
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessUnknownUnknown
Capabilitieschat, generationchat, generation

PaddleOCR VL 1.5 Capabilities

chatgeneration
Serving providers0
Canonical IDPaddlePaddle/PaddleOCR-VL-1.5

ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT Capabilities

chatgeneration
Serving providers0
Canonical IDbaidu/ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

PaddleOCR VL 1.5 vs ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT FAQs

Is PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both PaddleOCR VL 1.5 and ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT?+

Both models have the same sourced context window: 131,072 tokens each.

Which performs better in benchmarks, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. PaddleOCR VL 1.5 is open weight; ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is open weight.

Can PaddleOCR VL 1.5 and ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT understand images?+

PaddleOCR VL 1.5 is documented with image input; ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT?+

Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.

Do PaddleOCR VL 1.5 and ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT support reasoning and tool use?+

PaddleOCR VL 1.5: image input. ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT?+

PaddleOCR VL 1.5 has 0 sourced provider routes; ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT has 0, a tie.

Which offers better value, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback